<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search Partner Network Mysteries Revealed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.payperclicksearchmarketing.com/search-partner-network-mysteries-revealed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.payperclicksearchmarketing.com/search-partner-network-mysteries-revealed/</link>
	<description>Hyper Responsive Marketing for Achievement Oriented, Introspective Entrepreneurs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:01:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: travatgua</title>
		<link>http://www.payperclicksearchmarketing.com/search-partner-network-mysteries-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-3813</link>
		<dc:creator>travatgua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.payperclicksearchmarketing.com/?p=401#comment-3813</guid>
		<description>&quot;However, internationally there seem to be alot lower quality partners.&quot;
Are you sure that this is true?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;However, internationally there seem to be alot lower quality partners.&#8221;<br />
Are you sure that this is true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave J</title>
		<link>http://www.payperclicksearchmarketing.com/search-partner-network-mysteries-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-3288</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.payperclicksearchmarketing.com/?p=401#comment-3288</guid>
		<description>Because of the lack of transparency in the search partners, we&#039;ve stopped bothering to build out seperate PPC campaigns, and rather just turning it on or off.

The insight about different ads on different sites is a great imperative for creating 2 campaigns, one with search partners, and one without.

We&#039;ve been seeing that although CTR&#039;s are lower in the US, the CPA&#039;s / CPC&#039;s are still better. However, internationally there seem to be alot lower quality partners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because of the lack of transparency in the search partners, we&#8217;ve stopped bothering to build out seperate PPC campaigns, and rather just turning it on or off.</p>
<p>The insight about different ads on different sites is a great imperative for creating 2 campaigns, one with search partners, and one without.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been seeing that although CTR&#8217;s are lower in the US, the CPA&#8217;s / CPC&#8217;s are still better. However, internationally there seem to be alot lower quality partners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rothwell &#124; AdWordsAnswers.com</title>
		<link>http://www.payperclicksearchmarketing.com/search-partner-network-mysteries-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rothwell &#124; AdWordsAnswers.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 08:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.payperclicksearchmarketing.com/?p=401#comment-794</guid>
		<description>Hi Glenn,

many thanks for all this great content you\&#039;re releasing, it\&#039;s very informative. Keep it up!

On Partner networks: I\&#039;ve noticed over a long time now that the conversion rate and overall quality of Partner traffic is frequently very poor. 

Sometimes impressions for a given keyword will be tens or even hundreds of times higher on this network, and it\&#039;s impossible to know why. Needless to say this kills your ctr. 

That being said, cpc is usually lower, and conversion costs can be acceptable - only there\&#039;s a lot less of them.

I asked Google for a list of all the Partner sites, and they cannot produce a definitive one, although they point out some of the more well-known. I suspect this is because they don\&#039;t even really know, since new ones probably appear all the time.

I\&#039;ll only use a separate partner campaign these days with an ecommerce offer, where we can track conversions and costs with certainty.

Also, I prefer that to be in combination with Conversion Optimizer, having tested first with Google only, then scaling up a successful offer with acceptable CPA to other traffic sources.

Let us know how you\&#039;ve found CO to perform ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Glenn,</p>
<p>many thanks for all this great content you\&#8217;re releasing, it\&#8217;s very informative. Keep it up!</p>
<p>On Partner networks: I\&#8217;ve noticed over a long time now that the conversion rate and overall quality of Partner traffic is frequently very poor. </p>
<p>Sometimes impressions for a given keyword will be tens or even hundreds of times higher on this network, and it\&#8217;s impossible to know why. Needless to say this kills your ctr. </p>
<p>That being said, cpc is usually lower, and conversion costs can be acceptable &#8211; only there\&#8217;s a lot less of them.</p>
<p>I asked Google for a list of all the Partner sites, and they cannot produce a definitive one, although they point out some of the more well-known. I suspect this is because they don\&#8217;t even really know, since new ones probably appear all the time.</p>
<p>I\&#8217;ll only use a separate partner campaign these days with an ecommerce offer, where we can track conversions and costs with certainty.</p>
<p>Also, I prefer that to be in combination with Conversion Optimizer, having tested first with Google only, then scaling up a successful offer with acceptable CPA to other traffic sources.</p>
<p>Let us know how you\&#8217;ve found CO to perform &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.payperclicksearchmarketing.com/search-partner-network-mysteries-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 04:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.payperclicksearchmarketing.com/?p=401#comment-790</guid>
		<description>This is weird timing in that I just asked Jerrold earlier today about this as I&#039;m seeing quite a bid of bleed with Google impressions in my Search Partner campaigns, even though the SP bids are .05 less per click. (Way more than 30% in multiple campaigns.)

I&#039;m beginning to wonder if it makes sense to ignore separation until a keyword has established itself of being &quot;worthy&quot; to spend extra time on. (ie, 80/20)

Bring on the Pivot Table tutorial.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is weird timing in that I just asked Jerrold earlier today about this as I&#8217;m seeing quite a bid of bleed with Google impressions in my Search Partner campaigns, even though the SP bids are .05 less per click. (Way more than 30% in multiple campaigns.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m beginning to wonder if it makes sense to ignore separation until a keyword has established itself of being &#8220;worthy&#8221; to spend extra time on. (ie, 80/20)</p>
<p>Bring on the Pivot Table tutorial.  <img src='http://www.payperclicksearchmarketing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

